Reflective practice for early childhood educators

Reflective practice is one of those terms that appears constantly in early childhood education. It is embedded in the EYLF V2.0, in My Time, Our Place, in the National Quality Framework, and in virtually every professional development resource the sector produces. For many educators, it remains unclear what it means in practice and how it is supposed to show up in their documentation.

This is not a failing on the part of those educators. Reflective practice is a concept that gets described in abstract terms far more often than it gets explained concretely. This guide aims to change that: what reflective practice is, why it matters, the three types you need to know, and how to build it into your everyday work whether you are in long day care, family day care, or outside school hours care.

What reflective practice actually means

Reflective practice is the habit of thinking critically about your own professional actions, decisions, and assumptions in order to learn from them and improve. In an early childhood context it means thinking carefully about what happened in an interaction, a session, or an activity, asking why things went the way they did, what you might do differently, what it revealed about the children in your care, and what should change as a result.

It is not simply writing a few sentences at the end of a learning story. Done well, it is a genuine intellectual engagement with your own practice, the kind of thinking that improves your programming, deepens your understanding of individual children, and builds your professional expertise over time.

The National Quality Standard makes this expectation explicit. NQS 1.3.2 requires that critical reflection on children's learning and development, both as individuals and in groups, drives program planning and implementation. This sits within Standard 1.3, Assessment and planning, which covers the full cycle of observation, documentation, planning, implementation, and reflection. It is not a suggestion. It is a standard your service is assessed against.

Both the EYLF V2.0 (Belonging, Being and Becoming) and My Time, Our Place place reflective practice at the heart of professional identity. EYLF V2.0 lists critical reflection as one of its core practice elements, describing it as thoughtful and intentional consideration of what educators do, why they do it, and the effects of their actions on children. MTOP carries the same expectation for OSHC educators, emphasising ongoing reflection as essential to responsive programming for school-age children.

Why it gets neglected

Reflective practice gets neglected in early childhood centres for two main reasons: a lack of understanding of what is actually required, and a lack of confidence in how to do it.

The understanding problem is common even among experienced educators. If no one has ever clearly explained what a genuine reflection looks like compared to a superficial one, it is very difficult to produce the real thing. Many educators write reflections that describe what happened rather than analysing it. A description says what occurred. A reflection asks why, what it means, and what should follow.

The confidence problem is particularly common among educators who are not natural writers or who did not come into the sector with strong academic backgrounds. Reflective practice requires a certain willingness to examine your own decisions critically, and that can feel uncomfortable. Acknowledging that something did not go as planned, or that a child's reaction revealed something you had not anticipated, takes professional honesty that not every workplace culture supports.

The educational leader's role is critical here. A centre where reflective thinking is modelled openly, where uncertainty is treated as a starting point rather than a weakness, and where educators receive genuine feedback on their reflections rather than just a tick of approval, will develop reflective practitioners far more effectively than one where reflection is treated as a form to be completed.

The three types of reflection

The most useful framework for understanding reflection in practice comes from the work of Donald Schon and the subsequent contributions of Killion and Todnem. They describe three types of reflection that form a continuous cycle, each operating at a different point in relation to an activity or experience.

Reflection-for-action: before the activity

This is the planning dimension of reflective practice. Before an activity or session, a reflective educator draws on past experience, knowledge of the individual children, and understanding of the relevant framework to anticipate what might happen and plan accordingly.

Questions that support reflection-for-action include:

• What do I know about this child or group that should shape how I plan this activity?
• What outcomes am I hoping this activity will support, and why are they appropriate for these children right now?
• Are there any aspects of this activity that could inadvertently exclude or disadvantage any child, whether through cultural assumptions, physical demands, or language expectations?
• What have previous observations or reflections told me about what these children are ready for?
• What could go wrong, and how might I respond?

For long day care educators, this type of reflection connects directly to the EYLF V2.0 planning cycle, where programming is expected to be genuinely informed by observation and assessment rather than a default rotation of activities. For OSHC educators, it connects to the MTOP expectation that programs are responsive to the expressed interests and emerging needs of school-age children.

Reflection-in-action: during the activity

This is the real-time dimension of reflective practice. While an activity or session is underway, a reflective educator is continuously reading the room, noticing what is working and what is not, and adjusting in the moment.

Questions that support reflection-in-action include:

• Are the children engaged, and if not, what might be getting in the way?
• Is what I planned actually meeting the needs of this child or group right now, or do I need to adjust?
• What is this child's body language, facial expression, or verbal response telling me about their experience?
• Is there a bias in how the activity is unfolding, whether in who is participating, who is being called on, or whose contributions are being valued?
• What can I do right now to extend the learning or address a difficulty?

Reflection-in-action is the most immediate and often the most challenging form of reflection because it requires sustained professional attention during active supervision. It is also the type most likely to generate the richest observations, because the educator is watching closely and thinking carefully at exactly the moment something significant is happening.

Reflection-on-action: after the activity

This is the most commonly recognised form of reflective practice in documentation. After an activity or session has ended, the educator thinks back on what happened, what it revealed, and what should follow.

Questions that support reflection-on-action include:

• What went well, and what did not go as planned?
• What did I observe about individual children or the group that was significant?
• Which EYLF or MTOP outcomes were evident, and what specifically demonstrated them?
• What did this experience reveal about a child's current interests, capabilities, or areas of development?
• What would I do differently next time, and why?
• What should I plan next based on what I observed?

This type of reflection, when it is genuine, is what transforms a learning story from a description of an activity into a piece of professional documentation that has real value for planning, for family communication, and for demonstrating quality practice under the NQS.

What genuine reflection looks like in documentation

The difference between a superficial reflection and a genuine one is the difference between description and analysis.

A superficial reflection: "The children enjoyed the painting activity. They were engaged and creative."

A genuine reflection: "Most of the group engaged quickly with the painting activity, but I noticed that Oscar stayed on the periphery for the first ten minutes, watching rather than participating. When I sat beside him and commented on what the other children were doing without directly inviting him to join, he picked up a brush and began working independently. This tells me that Oscar may need more transition time before joining group activities, and that indirect invitations work better for him than direct ones. I want to observe this pattern across other activities this week before building it into his individual plan. This connects to EYLF Outcome 1.2, children develop their emerging autonomy, and to Outcome 3.1, children become increasingly independent."

The second reflection is not longer for the sake of it. It is longer because it contains genuine professional thinking: a specific observation, an educator response, a hypothesis about the child, a next step, and a meaningful outcome link. That is what NQS 1.3.2 is asking for.

How to build reflective practice into your day

Reflective practice does not require long uninterrupted writing time. It requires a habit of professional thinking that can be developed gradually and supported by the right conditions.

Make it part of documentation from the start. Every observation has a natural reflective question attached to it: what does this tell me, and what should I do next? If you write that question down as part of every learning story, reflection becomes inseparable from observation rather than an afterthought.

Use team meetings as a reflective space. Sharing an observation with colleagues and discussing what it might mean is a form of collaborative reflection that builds the thinking of the whole team. Educational leaders who build this habit into regular team time create a culture of reflective practice rather than treating it as a solo exercise.

Link your reflections to plans. One Child's threads of learning feature allows you to link learning stories to plans, making the journey from observation to reflection to planning visible and traceable. This is not just a useful feature. It is a direct demonstration of the planning cycle that NQS Quality Area 1 requires, visible and navigable for any assessor who reviews your service.

Review your own reflections over time. Reading back through your reflections from previous months is itself a reflective act. You will notice patterns, gaps, and growth. You will see which children appear frequently and which do not. You will notice whether your reflections have become more analytical over time or whether you have slipped back into description.

Apply both frameworks where they fit. For long day care educators, reflective questions should regularly reference the five outcomes of EYLF V2.0 and the framework's practice elements. For OSHC educators, the same discipline applies to My Time, Our Place. Both frameworks are explicit that reflection is not optional, and both reward documentation that shows genuine thinking about what children's experiences reveal about their learning.

Reflection as a professional identity

The educators who are most valued in early childhood settings, and who perform best under NQS assessment, are not necessarily the ones with the most experience or the most formal qualifications. They are the ones who think most carefully about what they do and why.

Reflective practice is the mechanism through which professional experience becomes professional wisdom. An educator who reflects well learns from every day they work. One who does not tends to repeat the same patterns without questioning them.

EYLF V2.0 and My Time, Our Place both describe educators as thoughtful, curious professionals who engage critically with their own practice. That description is an aspiration worth working toward, and reflective practice is how you get there.

One Child is designed to make reflection a natural, integrated part of documentation rather than an extra step. Explore how it works with a free trial.

Start your free trial